admin at survivalacres dot com

3 thoughts on “US-NATO Preemptive Nuclear Doctrine: Trigger a Middle East Nuclear Holocaust to Defend “The Western Way of Life”

  • February 14, 2008 at 4:25 pm
    I think Maslow said if all you have is a hammer, the whole world looks like a nail. I wonder if we really control our military anymore. Whatever happened to mutually assured destruction? I guess its morphed to globally assured destruction.
  • February 15, 2008 at 7:11 am
    Did you notice that one of the six problems that these warmongers cite is the population issue?

    “Population growth and change across the globe will swiftly change the world we knew. The challenge this poses for welfare, good governance and energy security (among other things) is vast.” Are they saying that this (with the other issues) is to be addressed by pre-emptive nuclear warfare? Fits in with my worry that the NWO wants to address the population issue with a nuclear -bio-chemical holocaust in the northern hemisphere.

    @ Michael: I think M.A.D. ended with Clinton’s PDD-60 to aborb a first strike, ostensibly because Russia was seen as newly trustworthy if a little suspect at securing nuclear warheads in backwater regions.

  • February 15, 2008 at 7:13 am
    There is a lot of bad science on display as well, in an attempt to somehow justify and mollify the gullible public.

    Ground-bursting nuclear weapon impacts (“underground” is the term taunted, but underground by a few feet might as well be surface impact….actual underground nuclear tests have the warhead buried thousands of feet down a then-filled shaft) are actually far more damaging, in terms of sheer quantity of radioactive-laden fallout produced, than traditional airbursts (more ejecta).

Leave a Reply