U.S. War Begins With Syria

I cannot tell, from the news sources that I’ve read, and the video that I have seen so far, if the “Syria chemical attack” is real or more faked news. Meaning – do they have incontrovertible proof that chemical weapons have been utilized? And IF so – who is responsible?

I know not to trust the media or the US government. I know that they will lie to serve their own ends. Yet up to 60 cruise missiles have now been launched at Syria by the United States. This part is probably true – and it is definitely “war”.

We’ve had so much disinformation from our media and our government that unraveling truth is always a challenge. Nothing is ever as it seems. So far, Syria claims they’ve not done such a thing, and yet other “witnesses” claim 3 victims have been examined with “preliminary” results of nerve gas attack.

Still pretty sketchy to me – especially since enough time has already passed to actually confirm this. Supposedly “hundreds have died” so there should be AMPLE evidence of chemical weapons. Next would come identifying the responsible party…

Note how public support can be easily manipulated – this is a technique followed for thousands of years. It goes like this: Attack your own people and blame your enemy. Garner public sympathy and support. Keep up the pretense long enough to get the war started in your favor as other peoples, nations, sympathizers turn against you.

So right now – I have NO IDEA who is telling the truth – but war has begun. The cruise missiles have landed. Pay close attention to how this unfolds in the days ahead – and the propaganda spin that is sure to come.


admin at survivalacres dot com

4 thoughts on “U.S. War Begins With Syria

  • April 6, 2017 at 9:13 pm

    This is almost exactly the same narrative as was used as a pretext for the invasion of Iraq by the US in 2003: ‘leader has used chemical weapons against his own people’.

    A couple of years ago the BBC got caught out fabricating a ‘news story’ about a chemical attack by Syrian government forces.

    The good news is that, as time passes, fewer and fewer people believe the official narrative about ANYTHING.

    I see that the price of oil has risen 2 or 3 dollars, which may well have been the immediate objective of the attack, along with testing the effectiveness of the upgraded Syrian defensive systems.

    We know that Putin does not want war, and the maniacs in Washington seem be betting on him not taking firm action in support of his ally in response to this latest outrage.

    • April 7, 2017 at 11:11 am

      I liked both articles. Trump is proving himself to be a madman. A dangerous, dangerous, deluded FOOL.


      I think we suddenly entered into very scary times again.

  • April 7, 2017 at 3:16 am

    Trump Fires Missiles on Syrian Airbase:

    “That Trump is getting really good media on this, particularly on TV, is particularly bad. Trump craves approval, and he is being trained, right now, to be violent. The consequences of this are potentially catastrophic….”

    “Hillary agrees with this. She wanted a no-fly zone over Syria after Russia was there, and argued that Obama should have bombed Syria over the last chemical attack. Trump was repeatedly on the record that the US should not attack Syria.”


Leave a Reply