Today’s decision by the black robed thugs still demonstrates that “shall not be infringed” is still not understood, even though most gun owners are going to claim this interpretation of today’s events as a “victory”.
Shall not be infringed means that the Federal government and the State’s cannot infringe upon your individual rights to “keep and bear arms”, PERIOD. Yet this decision “probably leaves most firearms laws intact“.
The truth is, the thousands of existing firearm “laws” in effect around the country infringe upon the right of the people to keep and bear arms.
This so-called “decision” (reinterpretation) of the Constitution by the Supremes does not have a damned thing to do with “self defense” as a right or reason of ownership. That is only one reason among many, but inferring this as the justification of ownership is patently absurd and shows a tremendous lack of understanding by the judges.
The dissenting judges are even more clueless then the rest. The Second Amendment does not even mention handguns (which means that are not regulated), yet in their dissenting opinions, this idiot writes:
“In my view, there simply is no untouchable constitutional right guaranteed by the Second Amendment to keep loaded handguns in the house in crime-ridden urban areas.”
Stupid fools. What part of “shall not be infringed” do they not understand. Clearly, ALL OF IT.
There’s more, even one of the thugs that ruled in ‘favor’ said this:
Scalia said nothing in Thursday’s ruling should “cast doubt on long-standing prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons or the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings.”
Which is why deranged killers can go on killing sprees in our country’s schoolyards. Does everyone realize that this is a direct result of the “no gun” policy in such locations? Even if you managed to vaporize every firearm in the country, any unprotected area (home, schoolyard, workplace, government building, city street) will be vulnerable to those that will do harm with ANY weapon (knife, baseball bat, chemical weapons, firebombs, anything).
Gun laws are WRONG and undermine (infringe) upon the basic right of firearm ownership, and even the true reason for firearm ownership.
Laws governing ownership, permits, licensing, registration, barrel length, stock design, magazine capacity and on and on and on are simply sucessful attempts of the government (city, state, federal) to infringe upon the rights of State citizens (as opposed to a Federal citizen) on their Constitutionally guaranteed right to keep and bear arms.
Anybody that tells you different is a liar, period. Here’s a bit of proof of this fact:
In dissent, Justice Stephen Breyer wrote, “The decision threatens to throw into doubt the constitutionality of gun laws throughout the United States.”
Gun laws are not constitutional and NEVER WERE. Period, end of story. The “interpretation” of the Constitution is not that hard, especially in this case. Shall not be infringed is stupidly simple, but still too much for the Supremes to understand.
Posted under Tyranny because this is exactly what the Second Amendment was REALLY for (read the Declaration of Independence if you do not believe this) and because the Supremes didn’t do their damned jobs (again).