The 10th Man Rule

  • The 10th Man rule is where any focus group intentionally appoints at least one person to serve as the loyal dissenter. If all nine advisors agree on the same thing, the 10th man is obligated to disagree and to try and find fault with the reasoning of the nine. This serves to both explore other possibilities and demonstrate any correctness of the nine.

In some cases, the 10th man will find faults serious enough to justify an entirely different course of action. I am a 10th man, as are several other voices that are trying to point out the faults with the current approach to deadly climate change. All nine, as it were, are in agreement, which means they should be questioned, they should be doubted, they should reconsider the validity of their claims, and they should be actively listening for the concerns of the “10th man”.

The current approach to climate science and future predictions have found sufficient levels of agreement, so much so that it should be more than a little alarming because they have often been wrong in the past. Yet the “nine still agree” as it were, even though they have updated their assessments and expectations each year, always for the worse.

This is not the same thing as what the 10th man would perform if there were such a position being utilized (which isn’t happening). The 10th man would point out the dire possibilities that would exist if the nine were wrong on any particular point. It is the job of the 10th man to be a pessimist, to predict and to try to plan and prepare for the very worst should any of the nine be wrong.

This position actually protects the nine, or in our case, the entire planet. If the 10th man rule were being followed now, we’d already be well on our way to climate mitigation efforts and strategies years ago when it was first understood. We would not be debating, discussing or pretending that we had more time, or a ‘carbon budget’, or pretending that ‘net-zero’ is a real possibility or anything other then a simply play on words. The 10th man rule would have eliminated these strategies as being both too slow, disingenuous and far too dangerous for our survival.

The 10th man would have pointed out the obvious and not-so-obvious faults with climate predictions and climate science, and how policy makers and governments tend to always ignore the worst and only choose to focus on the best. These particular faults and practices have now become institutionalized with policy makers, exacerbating the problem of climate inaction and delayed mitigation and adaption efforts all over the world.

Climate science is not practicing the 10th man rule. Any dissenting voices that disagree with the science, predictions, and probable outcomes are being broadly ignored and even silenced. Reports and assessments have been watered down and diluted to allow for a comfortable level of ‘acceptance’ to be adopted, when the data itself literally screams the exact opposite. We are in a global climate emergency that has yet to be declared by any government in the world.

The 10th men and women of the world that do exist have sought to make this state of emergency known. Lacking platforms, attention, readership and even funding, their efforts are still being ignored. They are ridiculed within the science community and by policy makers, who categorically refuse to believe that their own predictions can be wrong. Yet wrong they are, as the recent historical record has shown.

Countless examples exist within the climate science assessments leaving out critical data, numerous feedback mechanisms and underestimate events. 100-year events are now already occurring every year. Worse, policy presentations have gone along with manufactured claims of ‘carbon-free’ emissions, ‘net-zero’ industries, ‘carbon budgets’ and ‘carbon trading’ schemes, and exceedingly dangerous time lines promising decades of times still available to “safely reduce emissions” before devastating and non-stoppable feedbacks are set in motion.

This allows government and industry to continue to ignore climate trigger events already occurring all over the planet, claiming that these measurements somehow don’t signify an immediate climate emergency. These are examples of ignoring their own eyes and their own data. When the Arctic has clearly lost nearly all of its multi-year ice, this isn’t correctly assessed as signifying a global emergency, when it is already well-known that such an event is unprecedented in human history. The rapidly warming Arctic has warmed three times faster then the rest of the planet, with a Blue Ocean Event now extremely likely, allowing the sun to rapidly heat up this formerly ice-covered water, changing the global climate in deadly ways.

The 10th men and women around the world have warned of this and other events already unfolding, yet continue to be ignored. We believe this imperils the very survival of our species and that of the fauna of the Earth. An increase in wet-bulb temperatures already predicted by science will devastate the global food supply, collapsing civilization. But there are many other known events already unfolding, with Greenland and Antarctica already showing signs of destabilization, increasing sea level rise that will inundate the world’s shipping ports ending export and imports, excessive methane releases being detected in the Arctic, Siberia and the permafrost regions (2020 was 15.85 ± 0.47 ppb, which is the largest annual increase recorded since 1983 when NOAA’s ongoing measurements began), enormous amounts of ice melting throughout the world’s glaciers, and a very detectable disruption in the global jet stream patterns, among many other unfolding events. Even the Amazon is now known to be a carbon-emitter, release 20% more carbon then it uptakes, yet this very alarming event also doesn’t qualify as a climate emergency.

Earth habitability is within a very narrow range of temperature, seasonal variations, precipitation and geographical range. Humans cannot survive in large numbers in the coldest regions both North and South without enormous energy inputs, and excessive temperatures in the equatorial regions are already driving large numbers of migrants to immigrate to other countries. These inhospitable regions, particularly in the mid-latitudes are growing, affecting millions more people and decimating crop production through excessive temperatures and droughts.

Excessive solar energy is now being absorbed by the planet due to the enormous amounts of greenhouse gasses trapped in the atmosphere, raising global temperatures throughout the world, while even more greenhouse gas is being constantly added. While this is well known and understood by science, this still doesn’t seem to qualify as an “emergency”, something which every 10th man strongly disagree with. High levels of carbon dioxide and methane are being detected globally far in excess of anything humanity has ever experienced in our two million year history and still this doesn’t seem to qualify as a planetary emergency with policy makers and even most scientists.

This bizarre denial of their own data and assessments is inexplicable, but perhaps explainable. Disruptions to the global economy are considered more undesirable then planetary habitability in the short-term, but we know that this is very short-sighted thinking and likely to be extremely dangerous for our future survival. The sheer and near-total failure to assess these events and numerous others as a planetary emergency in their scale, scope and direction, is in the end, unforgivable for every human alive today. Our leaders are miserably failing to assess the situation correctly and belatedly think that they can somehow avoid both responsibility and culpability for these extinction-level events unfolding now.

As one of the voices long ignored, I continue to believe that a global planetary emergency needs to be immediately declared and every effort possible expended to mitigate and adapt our civilization in meaningful ways to lessen our chances of extinction. Each year the situation is just that much worse (and never better), each year, the assessment, predictions and expectations from science come closer and closer to my own made over fifteen years ago. Yet a critical difference still remains, with optimism and hopeful expectations being expressed by the “nine advisors” which I do not embrace whatsoever.

I continue to believe that they have utterly failed to accept their own results and tie them together with other known events unfolding around the world, leaving governments, industry and policy makers free to interpret false optimism and techno-fix solutions as the silver bullet to solve our common predicament “in the nick of time”. This approach is unconscionable, immoral and likely, quite deadly for the biosphere, and will undoubtedly lead to rapid extinctions of most life on earth.

Humanity is being led towards willful self-destruction by the sheer failure of global leaders to enforce immediate actions on a global scale to save Earth’s habitability. Governments and industry have consistently denied, deflect and flat-out refused to cooperate. Minimal efforts to date have been expended with non-enforceable promises made that are simply, never kept. Decades of irreversible time have now been lost, elevating dangerous trigger events to non-stoppable outcomes. Blame is deflected to consumers and individual consumption, with industry spending hundreds of millions of dollars attempting to deny and delay any effective actions while continuing to excessively pollute.

Every 10th man agrees with this assessment. We are at a exceedingly dangerous juncture where the future survival of our species on planet Earth is in serious doubt. We do not have any more time to waste, nor do we need to “know more” before taking effective actions. A planetary emergency must be declare immediately if our species hopes to survive.

admin

admin at survivalacres dot com

6 thoughts on “The 10th Man Rule

    • May 27, 2021 at 10:57 am
      Permalink

      The reason why they interject the ridiculous “temporary” claim is because they are trying to introduce the idea of hotter temperatures slowly to the public. They definitely know that there won’t be any temporary rise in temperatures, it will be every year, everywhere.

      Other terms used: “Earth’s annual average temperature will temporarily edge above a limit set by the Paris climate agreement.”

      So when the temperature spikes, they’ve taken the edge of it’s real meaning. On purpose. For YEARS they’ve been leaking out what they already know to be true, softening up public opinion and perceptions. This is part of their propaganda campaign to deflect the horrifying truth.

      The WMO forecast for the next several years also predicts a 90% chance that the world will set yet another record for the hottest year by the end of 2025 and that the Atlantic will continue to brew more potentially dangerous hurricanes than it used to.

      Damn right it will – probably this year. But hey, it’s just a “prediction”, right? Nothing to see here, move along…

  • May 27, 2021 at 2:22 am
    Permalink

    As a scientist (yes, qualified professionally and having done ground-breaking research in aqueous chemistry and in the identification of gases in a complex mixture) I must say that for me it is all about the Precautionary Principle, which in simple terms means DON’T DO IT UNLESS YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN IT IS SAFE.

    I wrote along those lines 20+ years ago.

    And the Precautionary Principle was thrown out the window, because people wanted to do highly risky things in order to generate fiat currencies, or wanted to transfer fiat currencies from one place to another.

    And now everyone -particularly every young person on the planet- pays the price for egregious stupidity and greed.

    Which will collapse first, the Ponzi financial system or the terminally declining energy system? Both together, I suspect.

    The environment will continue to collapse long after Ponzi finance and the energy system have collapsed and have taken down most of Industrial Civilisation with them.

    Abrupt Climate Change will finish off the job of terminating the remnants of IC.

    On the matter of the current ‘Climate Emergency’, the NZ government, along with many others, has declared a ‘Climate Emergency’, and has then gone on to promote everything that exacerbates that emergency….consumerism, tourism, use of fossil fuels, population growth etc.

    Completely bonkers (or utterly deceitful), depending on your perspective.

    • May 27, 2021 at 5:31 am
      Permalink

      Is that a real national declaration of climate emergency in NZ? Did they set up any kind of emergency commission and then issue directives? Or was this just a press publicity stunt? Let me know, because I am unaware of any country actually declaring the former – and actually following through with emergency orders that everyone, and especially industry, should follow. Talking points by politicians don’t qualify.

      I do not think governments have taken this seriously enough yet, and when they finally, finally do, it will be WAY TOO LATE. As you shared, they say one thing and then do exactly the opposite. They’re NOT SERIOUS. I think they’re all lying snakes.

      • May 27, 2021 at 10:38 am
        Permalink

        Yes, you are right. The NZ parliament voted to declare a ‘Climate Emergency’ but did nothing proactive to mitigate the emergency it had just declared: in fact all the actions were (and are) to make matters worse faster.

        ‘Climate Change—Declaration of Emergency

        Rt Hon JACINDA ARDERN (Prime Minister): I move, That this House

        – declare a climate emergency, following the finding of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change that, to avoid a more than 1.5°C rise in global warming, global emissions would need to fall by around 45 percent from 2010 levels by 2030, reaching net zero by around 2050; – recognise the advocacy of New Zealanders in calling for action to protect the environment and reduce the impact of human activity on the climate; – join the over 1,800 jurisdictions in 32 countries to declare a climate emergency and commit to reducing emissions to avoid a more than 1.5°C rise in global warming; – recognise the devastating impact that volatile and extreme weather will have on New Zealand and the wellbeing of New Zealanders, on our primary industries, water availability, and public health, through flooding, sea-level rise, and wildfire damage; – note that climate change is one of the greatest challenges of our time, that the Government has made significant progress on meeting that challenge through the Paris Agreement and the Climate Change Response (Zero Carbon) Amendment Act 2019, and that New Zealand has committed to taking urgent action on greenhouse gas mitigation and climate change adaptation; – acknowledge the core tenets of New Zealand’s response by establishing emissions budgets that set us on a path to net zero by 2050, setting a price on emissions through the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme, transitioning to a low-carbon economy and planning for climate adaption; – implement the policies required to meet the targets in the Climate Change Response (Zero Carbon) Amendment Act 2019, and to increase support for striving towards 100 percent renewable electricity generation, low carbon energy, and transport systems; – seize the economic opportunities that a clean, green reputation provides; – create green jobs in the low-carbon economy while managing risks for workers and communities currently reliant on carbon-intensive sectors; – recognise the alarming trend in species decline and global biodiversity crisis, including the decline in Aotearoa’s indigenous biodiversity, and acknowledge New Zealand’s strategic framework for the protection and restoration of biodiversity Te Mana o te Taiao; – note that the Government will take further steps towards reducing and eliminating waste; and – show leadership and demonstrate what is possible to other sectors of the New Zealand economy by reducing the Government’s own emissions and becoming a carbon-neutral Government by 2025.

        I think the first and most important point to make is that this is a declaration based on science. The United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the pre-eminent scientific body in the world on this matter, has determined that in order to avoid a disastrous 1.5 degree Celsius rise in global temperatures and beyond—a rise that would see increased risk to human health and livelihood, civil unrest, mass drought, disease, loss of lands and homes, increased fires, increased tropical storms, mass human displacement, and globally exhausted resources—we must act with urgency to ensure global emissions fall to net zero by 2050…..’

        https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/hansard-debates/rhr/combined/HansDeb_20201202_20201202_08

        The numbers are absolute crap, of course, as is the narrative of the UNIPCC of keeping the world under 1.5oC of overheating via the weakest emissions cut they think they can get away with.

        Of particular note is the constant repetition of the term ‘net zero’, as if here is some way to keep desequestering carbon by the multi-megatonne and keep putting CO2 into the atmosphere and oceans whilst at the same tine sequestering it by the multi-megatonne.

        The ever-increasing atmospheric CO2 level and ever-increasing CH4 level we are witnessing indicate clearly how this flawed strategy is going to work out.

        A dead planet ( well maybe good for jellyfish and bacteria).

        • May 27, 2021 at 10:41 am
          Permalink

          By the way, NZ emissions have INCREASED about 20% since NZ signed up to the now-defunct Kyoto Protocol of 1997.

Leave a Reply