Saudi Arabia Promises Zero Carbon by 2060
In an utterly ridiculous claim, Saudi Arabia promises something that they can never, ever deliver unless they cap all of their oil wells – Top oil exporter Saudi Arabia targets zero carbon emissions by 2060. Phys.org should be ashamed of themselves for publishing such lies, but probably isn’t. Not the first time I’ve seen this website promote complete falsehoods.
Without checking, Saudia Arabia’s oil reserves will be in complete collapse by 2060, thus accomplishing their pretended goals of “net zero”, a dishonest term if there ever was one. The ONLY thing that has kept the kingdom ‘afloat’ is the sea of oil they’ve been draining dry and all the insane ‘investors’ hell-bent on creating an oasis in a dusty desert where even water is more precious then oil. Desalinization took care of that – as long as the oil flows to create the intensive energy needed.
The morons that wrote this article want you to believe this:
Saudi Arabia is estimated to emit about 600 million tonnes of carbon dioxide per year—more than France and slightly less than Germany.
What they won’t tell you in the hundreds of billions of tons of Saudia Arabia black death that is being burned yearly elsewhere. See, that’s how you do “net-zero” crapulations – you lie about what you’re really producing and offload your real emissions somewhere else. It’s a scam and always will be.
What you didn’t and won’t read is what has been obvious – LEAVE IT IN THE GROUND.
This is yet another propaganda piece pushed by a science-based website. If they didn’t publish this, undoubtedly someone else with the same low-expectations and integrity would have. Lying to the public is completely normalized.
6 thoughts on “Saudi Arabia Promises Zero Carbon by 2060”
The good thing about the Saudi policy of forcing ‘black gold’ out of rapidly depleting oil wells using sea water is that they will destroy the habitability of Saudi Arabia long before any ridiculous claims about ‘carbon neutrality’ are discovered to be a scam.
Saudi Arabia is one of those countries that has undergone a population explosion of truly staggering proportions: approximately an 8-fold increase in population in my lifetime, from around 4 million to around 34 million.
The futile attempt grow wheat was abandoned many years ago in favour of selling oil and buying wheat.
There is now a very large and very restless population of very unhappy people who cannot wait to break into the palaces and steal the gold-plated toilet seats and gold lined spa baths the controllers of the society have acquired over many decades via looting of natural resources and global polluting. But you can’t eat gold. And it’s not known for its thirst-quenching properties.
Make your booking for indoor skiing in the middle of a desert [at horrendous energy cost and horrendous environmental cost]. Such outlandish extravagances won’t be available for much longer.
Of course, Saudi Arabia WILL be ‘carbon zero’ long before 2060 because everyone will be long dead by then.
I’m surprised that supposedly ‘intelligent scientists’ still haven’t figured this all out. Either they don’t want to, are not be allowed to, or answer to those who can dictate what is being published. There are countless articles, publications and studies that extoll the ‘how’ the world is going to make this magical transition without exploring the folly behind these lies. I wish it were actually true. I wish we COULD limit warming to 1.5C, or make a renewable transition that would give us a fighting chance, but I have not seen anything that can actually do this. Temperature regulation is going to be FAR more important then “lower emissions” in the near-term, which is being almost entirely ignored. Dumb as fuck.
NZ’s scam artist James Shaw will be attending the Glasgow talkfest, geared to doing absolutely nothing to prevent accelerating Planetary Meltdown.
The Greed Party Shaw is co-leader of has, at various times, promoted Quantitative Easing to stimulate economic growth, a ‘shift to biofuels as a way of reducing oil dependency’, and ‘[international] tourism as a component of a sustainable economy’.
Whether he is a complete fuckwit or just a professional liar is not easy to determine. I suspect both.
NZ is doing better then most countries on COVID –
The initial spike in deaths throughout much of the world was due to misdiagnosis -Covid is a vascular disease which gains entry to the body via airways, and not a respiratory disease as such; incorrect treatments, particularly forcing high levels of oxygen into patients suffering from elevated levels of free radicals in their cells and bloodstreams caused overloading of the body’s free radical neutralisation systems. The ventilator treatments were killing people by the thousand.
The so-called vaccine being forced on the NZ populace is not a vaccine at all; it is a cell biology modifier, based on messenger RNA. It has not been tested for medium-term side effects, let alone long-term side effects. And the latest data coming out of the UK (which is somewhat ahead of NZ in the jabbing process) is that the the presence of foreign genetic material in cells has all kinds of unanticipated consequences, including a reduced resistance to infection. Thus, in the UK, after the initial round of jabbing, it was announced that ‘follow up’ jabs would be necessary. There was so much confusion because nobody actually knew (it all being an experiment) that the timing between first and second jabs was to be two or three weeks, then changed six to eight weeks, then changed back to two to three weeks.
What is more, with people who have been jabbed becoming infected with and transmitting it to others, there is now talk of ‘booster’ jabs because the efficacy declines so rapidly.
Careful reading of government own literature on the matter reveals that the government itself admitted that the only benefit of the Pfizer jab was a reduction in the intensity of the symptoms. Clearly the agenda was to prevent the health system (which has been underfunded for decades, following the disastrous ‘free market’ reforms of the 1980s) from collapsing.
Of course most people don’t read, and get their misinformation from soundbites churned out by the corporate media, which is purely profit-driven and refuses to broadcast anything that challenges the bullshit mainstream narratives.
Many people see the incipient draconian measures as being signaled by the LINO (Labour In Name Only) government of Jacinda Adern as progression towards a fully overtly fascist state.
It is abundantly clear to anyone with a brain that still functions properly (maybe 10% of the population) that a succession of governments have made such a mess of everything – from the energy system to housing to the health, and everything between- that an implosion is inevitable fairly soon. So what we are witnessing is control of the masses via restrictions where one can go, what one can do and who one can associate with. This will naturally progress to restrictions on what one can buy and who one can buy from.
NZ has been run by criminals and clowns for decades, and the consequences corruption lies and ineptitude can no longer be concealed. Desperate to hang on to power, they will ensure that the masses get sacrificed to teh machine in order to retain their unjustified accumulation of wealth. People like John Key, ex-prime minister, who acquired multi-millions by working against the best interests of the NZ populace. The sociopaths and psychopaths still hold enormous power even when not in parliament, as directors or members of boards of all kinds of corrupt organisations throughout the land.
What is interesting is that Jacinda Adern’s lies are not holding water the way they did when she emerged out of nowhere to become Prime Minister. (We know that she was trained for the position over a long period, commencing around 2002, by such professional liars as Tony B Liar and the much-hated Helen Clark.)
It would not surprise me to see Adern resign ‘for family reasons’ fairly soon, now that the heat is being turned on her and she has no answers. Like most fake leaders, she is essentially a coward. On the other hand, once a person become power-crazed, as Adern has become, there is a tendency to not see the writing on the wall.
Of course the same kind of narrative applies to most other ‘developed’ nations.
The next round of fuel price rises looks likely soon.
Brent Crude 86.38 +0.48%
Brent Crude Oil Price Charts | Oilprice.com
Sigh… you should know better then posting this. This is conjecture and grossly inaccurate.
a) “The initial spike in deaths throughout much of the world was due to misdiagnosis” – Not true. The initial spike in deaths was lack of proper treatment. The diagnosis was correct, patients had COVID. Oxygenation was and still is being used to this day for those both on and off ventilators. Some patients actually need this to stay alive.
b) There is no evidence that “ventilator treatments were killing people by the thousand”. This is conjecture and not backed up with any credible studies. Critically ill patients that required ventilation were already likely to die. Intubating ins some cases is the only option. There is no known correlation between the two, it’s speculative at best, disingenuous at worst.
c) “The so-called vaccine being forced on the NZ populace is not a vaccine at all;” – of course it is. It may not fit the generally accepted definition of a “vaccine” but it is still a vaccine nonetheless. It is a new type of vaccine as noted.
d) “It has not been tested for medium-term side effects, let alone long-term side effects.” – What’s your definition of “medium” and “long” term? Be specific in terms of months and years. The vaccines WERE tested extensively before receiving emergency approvals. To date, there is still no significant side effects.
e) And the latest data coming out of the UK (which is somewhat ahead of NZ in the jabbing process) is that the the presence of foreign genetic material in cells has all kinds of unanticipated consequences, including a reduced resistance to infection. Thus, in the UK, after the initial round of jabbing, it was announced that ‘follow up’ jabs would be necessary. There was so much confusion because nobody actually knew (it all being an experiment) that the timing between first and second jabs was to be two or three weeks, then changed six to eight weeks, then changed back to two to three weeks. – This is all misleading, speculative bullshit. There is no evidence of “reduced resistance to infection”. Infection to what? It’s proven to increase resistance to COVID. The “follow up” commentary is useless conjecture. That is NOT why follow-up vaccinations were used. Fully vaccinated individuals required TWO vaccinations, spaced weeks apart. It also depends on WHICH vaccine is being used on how far apart each vaccination shot would be.
f) What is more, with people who have been jabbed becoming infected with and transmitting it to others, there is now talk of ‘booster’ jabs because the efficacy declines so rapidly. – This is so much bullshit that it boggle my mind. The presumption and allegation here is that vaccinated (“jabbed”) individuals are becoming infected from the vaccination – which is 100% bullshit. That is NOT what happens if a vaccinated individual actually contracts COVID – they do not contract it from the vaccination, this is a physical impossibility. COVID is passed from individual to individual, period. Vaccinated people have a FAR better chance at survival and lower complications then non-vaccinated people. The “efficacy declines” are also incorrect. It depends on the vaccination received. The Moderna vaccination has the highest efficacy of all and even after six months retained 93% of the anti-bodies. This vaccination proved to be more effective the the Pfizer and all others, but it’s a meaningless straw argument anyway. The MUTATIONS being exhibited by the virus are making vaccinations a difficult target, most are still effective, but none are “guarantees” of lifetime immunity. The fact is – nobody is “immune” if vaccinated, you can still contract COVID, but your chances of reduced illness and survival are GREATLY enhanced if vaccinated.
g) Careful reading of government own literature on the matter reveals that the government itself admitted that the only benefit of the Pfizer jab was a reduction in the intensity of the symptoms. Clearly the agenda was to prevent the health system (which has been underfunded for decades, following the disastrous ‘free market’ reforms of the 1980s) from collapsing. – What a load of horseshit. Pure conjecture and straw arguments. There is NO proof of this ridiculous claim. Just confirmation bias and speculative assumption. The “health system” where? Which ones were “collapsing”?
Seriously – this will be the LAST anti-vaccination garbage I’ll allow here. I don’t allow disinformation on this blog. It’s dangerous, it’s stupid and it’s causing people to die. I’ve read the claims, the conjecture, the straw arguments and their “proofs” which I have found to be complete bullshit. It’s not based on actual medical facts and research but speculative garbage.