Cheney Wants Surveillance Law Expanded

Vice President Dick Cheney prodded Congress on Wednesday to extend and broaden an expiring surveillance law, saying “fighting the war on terror [Americans] is a long-term enterprise” that should not come with an expiration date. Cheney Wants Surveillance Law Expanded

That’s what he should have said. Cheney and all of his ilk are still pushing to increase surveillance on Americans. We’re constantly being reminded that this kind of unadulterated bullshit is for our protection and security needs, but it’s part of a long history of lies being spewed forth from these demon spawn.

More here on this entire issue:

This is a brand new world of spying being authorized by Congress against innocent Americans (under Title I of the Senate bills) without any meaningful Judicial Branch check. New corporate and government spying authority which is being accompanied by a simultaneous effort to hold immune from lawsuits the cooperating corporations, that would block off Judicial Branch review to prevent the Supreme Court from having an opportunity to rule that these spying authorities openly violate the Fourth Amendment. Fisa and What’s At Stake

Essentially, the Bush Administration, as always, is lying through it’s teeth again about the purpose and reasons for spying on Americans. This is one of those times you just wish Planet X would impact Washington D.C., or even nearby. We can’t be rid of these life-sucking scum soon enough.


admin at survivalacres dot com

5 thoughts on “Cheney Wants Surveillance Law Expanded

  • January 23, 2008 at 2:30 pm

    Who (with a brain and curious mind) still ‘thinks’ that Beelezebush and Darth are going to ‘go quietly into that good night’ come next Jan. after (given that) they have so ‘carefully’ totally and thoroughly shredded the Constitution, BOR etc. ?? Ha ha ha ha ha …

  • January 23, 2008 at 3:14 pm

    Assuming that by ‘go quietly into that good night’ you mean they give up office to the next president-elect — yes, of course it’s reasonable to think that can still happen. Don’t you? They can certainly trust a President McCain, Romney, Hillary or Obama to carry forward in their constitution-shredding footsteps.

    I’m not saying I think suspension of elections definitely *won’t* happen, just that there seems to be no reason for the elite to give up the tried and true illusion-of-choice method.

  • January 24, 2008 at 8:14 am

    Paul Craig Roberts, a Republican who worked in the Reagan administration, is predicting a 9-11 type of attack before the 2008 elections. If that occurs, Bush can declare martial law and begin arresting those who disagree with his foreign policy (based on Executive Orders recently issued by the Bush Administration that grant the president these powers and more.) Wild stuff.


  • January 24, 2008 at 3:12 pm

    Yeah, I’ve described that scenario to my friends, and the nihilistic part of me hopes that Bush actually does it just so as I can say “I told you so” to my friends.


  • January 24, 2008 at 4:59 pm

    they’ve purposefully surveyed the road – path to their future (NWO, GWOT, permanent (resource) wars for faith and profits)

    they’ve fanatically felled/leveled the ‘right-of-way’ (destroyed BOR, USC, WOT, economy/US$)

    they’ve religiously built the roadbed (no exits aka no rights, constitution)

    they’ve judiciously ‘ordered’ (laid) the pavement.


    don’t you think that they’ll go down it?
    or at least ‘try’?

    Hell, they can do ANYTHING (remember?) – especially ‘the unthinkable’ (actually, ‘unspeakable’)

Leave a Reply